« April 2009 | Main | June 2009 »
I'm off to find a child friendly (and wower averse) flowering plant for my daughters.
Posted at 12:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
I don't drink much. I don't socialise much. On Wednesday I did both. It was only 3 pints and 2 friends and 1 night, but it was fun.
Posted at 06:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
I recently googled myself trying to find an article I wrote some time ago and discovered that my website is listed on a site about Chinese medicines and herbs. I feel honoured. We Chings know a thing or two about such things.
For their experiment, researchers sent pairs of matched CVs in response to 240 job adverts in three sectors. In each case the two fictitious applicants had equivalent qualifications, skills and expertise – all gained in Ireland – but while one candidate had an Irish name, the other was Asian, African or German. The result was that job applicants with typical Irish names were twice as likely to be called for interview as those with minority names – an odds ratio that was high, though not unprecedented, by international standards. A Wolfgang Schröder – or a Constance Markiewicz – has only half the chance of a Patrick Murphy of getting an interview.
A striking feature was that, unlike in many other countries, the odds of being called to interview are very similar for applicants with African, Asian and German names
[They] interpreted this as a positive desire among employers to hire Irish people as opposed to a dislike of hiring foreign workers.
Posted at 04:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
I'd like to find the clever clogs who decided to name the character on my daughters sqeezy yoghert thing "Farquar" and then get him/her to explain why my 3 year old is now going round telling her Mum that Dad said the yoghert is called Fucker.
Posted at 03:44 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
My 6 year old daughter was sick yesterday (and recovering today) and I've been looking after them. Yesterday, I took them for a picnic at "The Pineapple" which is a little-known historic building,half way between Stirling and Falkirk; it has a very large few-hundred-year-old pineapple on its roof. There's a pond there that advertises its newt population. We stood there for 5 minutes looking for newts. There were no newts. We were okay about that. We assume they were good newts, none the less.
Sent using my BlackBerry Bold - the thinking man's iphone. www.clarkeching.com +44(0)7920114893 Clarke Ching - Author of "Rolling Rocks Downhill" ... a business novel about software development; coming soon from the Pragmatic Bookshelf.
Posted at 03:29 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Some energetic and enthusiastic English fella just won The Best Job in the World. He gets some money, get's to work a few hours, and gets to live on an Australian holiday island. It was a rather clever marketing gimmic put together by someone in the Oz holiday industry. It certainly got them some great free promotion here in the UK.
Posted at 11:49 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
I found a 5 leaf clover this morning. In fact, I found a bunch of them all growing from the same plant - it must be a mutant.
Posted at 11:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)
I've just given up on twitter. Why? It was a distraction - empty calories - and while it wasn't taking all that much of my time, I honestly think it was affecting my concentration and diverting my attention from more important things. That's a personal decision, really, not a reflection on Twitter so much as on me.
Posted at 07:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (3)
I've been writing loads lately about the difference between inventing a recipe and cooking a recipe. I've been doing that while rewriting the 50 page "light bulb moment" in RollingRocksDownhill. I won't go into the details here but the recipe analogy is very useful when thinking about software development.
Just today, I've realised that the recipe analogy also explains why many agile implementations fail.
I restarted using our Bread Machine a month or so ago and it's been fantastic. My children think I make the best bread in the world, but they don't realise that I follow a very simple recipe and the machine does all the hard work.
One thing I've noticed is that I must always "babysit" the bread machine through its first few cycles - the one's where it mixes the flour, water, yeast etc into a dough. It doesn't seem to matter how careful I measure the ingredients when I load them into the machine, the dough is always either a little too wet or little too dry and I have to fix it by adding a little more flour or a little more water. I'm no baker, but it's always obvious - if you've cooked bread you'll know what I mean - when I should stop tweaking, step away and let the machine follow it's course. The dough either looks right or it looks wrong, simple as that.
A friend of mine, Brian Swan, just wrote to me, saying:
"More and more I'm seeing "Agile" being implemented as the Scrum ceremonies (planning meeting, standups, sprint demo and retro), missing both the business focus on releasing something early and the technical focus on quality. In some cases this form of "Agile" is actually worse than what was there before."
Brian is, in my words, saying that they following the recipe, but they don't know how to tell if the dough looks right or wrong. If you don’t know what it’s supposed to look like then oftentimes you’re gonna cook shitty bread.
That’s blindingly obvious isn’t it?
There's a lot of the bitching and moaning within the Agile community these days about Scrum (mostly from very clever XP folk who don’t see the irony in thinking everyone should be extreme).
But, the problem is not with Scrum itself, the problem is that Scrum looks easy (take some flour, some water, some yeast) and it looks like it should be easy to do-it-yourself. But it's not. Scrum is really hard work. It might look easy, but it's also easy to screw up if you don’t know what ScumDough is supposed to look like.
That, I’ve realised, is what people like Brian and I do for a living.
Posted at 04:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)